PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL)

A compilation of PIL cases in Bangladesh

Case Number: Writ Petition No. 10481 of 2011
Date of filing: 2011/01/31
Print


Petitioners

Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA)

Respondents
  1. Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest
  2. Director General, PoribeshOdidaptar, Dhaka
  3. Deputy Director, PoribeshOdidaptar, Sylhet
  4. Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet
  5. UpazillaNirbahi Officer, Gowinghat, Sylhet
  6. Deputy Director, Mineral Resources Development Bureau
Facts

Public agencies created illegal pressure to stop the stone processing plant and business, and did not issue ‘পরিবেশগত ছারপত্র to run business.

Rule/Order/Judgment
Date: 20/11/2013


Details

The High Court issued a Rule Nisi to show causes as to why the creation of pressure and disturbance upon the petitioner to stop the stone collection and processing business situated at Sylhet before allowing or rejecting the application for issuing ‘যান্ত্রিক পদ্ধতিতে পাথর উত্তোলনের জন্য পরিবেশগত ছারপত্র’ in favour of the petitioner should not be declared to have been made without lawful authority.

Justices

Mr. Justice Naima Haider
 

Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed



Database Last Updated on: 2017-02-12 15:26:45
Area of law
Environment,
Accountability and Institutional Reform
Keywords
‘Pathor Mahal Sylhet’ case
Relevant statute

Constitution, Articles 102





Case Number: Writ Petition No. 10481 of 2011
Date of filing: 2011/01/31

Petitioners

Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA)

Respondents
  1. Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest
  2. Director General, PoribeshOdidaptar, Dhaka
  3. Deputy Director, PoribeshOdidaptar, Sylhet
  4. Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet
  5. UpazillaNirbahi Officer, Gowinghat, Sylhet
  6. Deputy Director, Mineral Resources Development Bureau
Facts

Public agencies created illegal pressure to stop the stone processing plant and business, and did not issue ‘পরিবেশগত ছারপত্র to run business.


Rule/Order/Judgment
Date: 20/11/2013:
Details

The High Court issued a Rule Nisi to show causes as to why the creation of pressure and disturbance upon the petitioner to stop the stone collection and processing business situated at Sylhet before allowing or rejecting the application for issuing ‘যান্ত্রিক পদ্ধতিতে পাথর উত্তোলনের জন্য পরিবেশগত ছারপত্র’ in favour of the petitioner should not be declared to have been made without lawful authority.

Justices

Mr. Justice Naima Haider,   ,  

Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed



Reference

Area of law
Environment,  Accountability and Institutional Reform

Keywords
‘Pathor Mahal Sylhet’ case

Relevant statute

Constitution, Articles 102


Related Proceedings
Database Last Updated on: 2017-02-12 15:26:45